Yes, Biden and Stalin said the Same Thing About Who Counts the Votes

The first hallmark of a budding totalitarian regime is to distort reality in the minds of the masses through censorship and propaganda. A misled populace can’t oppose evil plans if they don’t realize what’s going on around them. That’s why the founders of the United States were so wise to give free speech top priority in the Bill of Rights. They knew that all sides of an issue must be examined for good decisions to be made. This is ancient, God-given wisdom:

“The one who states his case first seems right, until the other comes and examines him.” (Proverbs 18:17)

If you’ve been paying attention, free speech has been under a terrifying level of all-out attack in recent years. There is a long list of topics in which mainstream media and big tech social media platforms will not tolerate dissenting viewpoints – election fraud being at the top of the list. “Fact checkers” are deployed at dizzying speeds anytime an inconvenient truth pops up in the public eye that threatens to give the masses a balanced view of selected subjects.

It caused quite a problem for the media, for example, when Joe Biden said in an official speech about voting rights in early 2022:

“The struggle’s no longer just who gets to vote. It’s about who gets to count the vote.”

Many quickly pointed out that a very similar quote was attributed to Joseph Stalin, a person no one in their right mind wants their leaders to emulate.

Stalin’s quote appears in Bazhanov and the Damnation of Stalin published in 1930 by Joseph Stalin’s personal secretary, Boris Bazhanov, in a chapter titled “Observations of the Politico Secretary.” Translated from the original Russian by David Doyle in the 1990 edition of the book, Stalin said,

“I believe that who and how people in the Party vote, is unimportant. What is extremely important is who counts the votes, and how they are recorded.”

Bazhanov then recounts a Communist Party election in which Stalin instructed a man named Nazaretian who worked at Pravda, the official newspaper of the Communist Party, to simply switch the results from each “cell” as they came in and report them, so it looked like the Central Committee in power had won in a landslide, when the reality was, they had lost in a landslide. Since these switches were done only a little bit at a time, the false reporting was also discovered only a little bit at a time. So, no one realized the magnitude of the problem until it was too late. Pravda promised to fix the errors, but the impression was already out that those in power had won reelection in a landslide and there was no going back. The election was a complete fraud achieved simply by false reporting of the results. After handing Stalin a victory by this deception, Stalin made sure Nazaretian was blamed for the “errors,” fired from his position at Pravda, and later shot.

There are several examples of fact checkers falling all over themselves to try to distinguish between Biden and Stalin expressing the same idea that elections are controlled by who counts and reports the votes. Basically, the argument boils down to the fact-checkers’ faith that Biden is speaking out of only the best motives, and he would never do the sorts of things Stalin did – like persecute political opponents, for example.

Oddly, even before Biden expressed his agreement with Stalin about elections, there was an all-out effort to try to deny that Stalin ever said such a thing about counting and reporting votes in the first place. One argument is that modern-day experts just don’t think Stalin ever would have said it. So, these fact-checkers can ignore the historical record of Stalin’s personal secretary, Boris Bazhanov? The fact-checkers can question the legitimacy of this quote after an 80-year period where the attribution to Stalin was never raised or challenged? Another argument from the auspicious fact-checkers is that the version of the quote found floating around social media was simply not a good literal translation from the original Russian, which gave them the prerogative to label it as “false” and censor it into oblivion.

Why should we care if Biden and Stalin had the same ideas about elections? Because there is evidence that the reporting of election results in the United States is almost as fictitious as Pravda’s was in the election described by Bazhanov.

This article summarizes the many problems with the process of how votes are reported in the United States and the impossible anomalies in the data from the 2020 election. For starters, the company which has the monopoly on national election night reporting (just like Pravda did), is called Scytl and it’s a Spanish company! Allowing a foreign company to control the reporting of our election results is an insane subversion of national security and sovereignty.

Everyone remembers when election officials “stopped counting” in all the swing states when Donald Trump was leading comfortably during the 2020 election. Over the following days, Trump’s lead was slowly erased until the media declared Biden the winner. The election reporting data in the swing states was ridiculous – there were enormous dumps of votes for Biden with no change for Trump, hundreds of vote dumps in a row with the same percentage of votes going to each candidate. It was clearly calculated to achieve a pre-determined outcome, and clearly not real:

This mathematically impossible phenomenon in the election night reporting data has come to be known as the “F-Curve” or “Fraud Curve,” and it has become a widely recognized meme representing the 2020 election:

But as we learned after 2020, no matter how much evidence of fraud, illegalities, and maladministration can be uncovered after the fact, there is no correcting an election after a winner is announced – something Stalin knew a long time ago – especially when the media and big tech willingly participate in censorship to keep it from being exposed.

This same tactic was used this July by Venezuelan dictator, Nicolas Maduro. Exit polls showed his opposition, Edmundo Gonzalez, with a massive 65% to 31% lead at the end of election day. Even the official vote counters posted a photo with election results showing Maduro losing in a landslide, in agreement with the exit polling.

But despite the reality, within hours Maduro declared himself the winner anyway, claiming he received 51% of the vote. This move was met with massive international condemnation – even from the U.S. government which has been loath to admit widespread election fraud even exists.

The 2024 election is shaping up to be the most consequential of our lifetime. It is imperative that Americans refuse to sign off on another fraudulent election – should that be the plan of the Biden regime who are so concerned with who counts the votes. Demand your County Commissioners perform due diligence and spend time examining the election records that they are supposed to certify before they give them a rubber stamp. Reports of voter intimidation and fraud must be reported to and investigated by authorities – starting with the New Mexico Secretary of State who sent mailers to illegal aliens using fraudulent addresses inviting them to register to vote.

Americans, don’t let the fact checkers gaslight you into signing off on a fraudulent election ever again.